<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Do So Love Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bradbury</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>bradbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>CFL&#039;s are not green, but create &quot;dirty electricity&quot;, an invisible pollutant that is associated with adverse health effects which range from headaches, sleep disorders, skin disease and cancers.  The public is not being informed that in addition to the mercury content, CFL&#039;s emit RF and UV radiation.  Don&#039;t confuse tube flourecent light bulbs that have diffusers to  mitigate UV, which CFL&#039;s that don&#039;t have.  Medical doctors are aware that CFL&#039;s emit radiation and advise their pacemaker patients not use or be exposed to CFL&#039;s.  See bioinitiative.org for information concerning the biological effects of electromagnetic radition. It is ironic that Gore is an environmentalist, yet is promoting CFL&#039;s.  When will policy makers listen and learn from the scientists who are not aligned with industry? Congress was ignorant when it passed an energy bill that included a ban on incandescent light bulbs beginning in 2014. (See also Milham/Morgan 2008 study of cancer incidence in California Schools and electromagnetic exposure, and 2008 Venice Resolution at ICEMS.eu).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFL&#8217;s are not green, but create &#8220;dirty electricity&#8221;, an invisible pollutant that is associated with adverse health effects which range from headaches, sleep disorders, skin disease and cancers.  The public is not being informed that in addition to the mercury content, CFL&#8217;s emit RF and UV radiation.  Don&#8217;t confuse tube flourecent light bulbs that have diffusers to  mitigate UV, which CFL&#8217;s that don&#8217;t have.  Medical doctors are aware that CFL&#8217;s emit radiation and advise their pacemaker patients not use or be exposed to CFL&#8217;s.  See bioinitiative.org for information concerning the biological effects of electromagnetic radition. It is ironic that Gore is an environmentalist, yet is promoting CFL&#8217;s.  When will policy makers listen and learn from the scientists who are not aligned with industry? Congress was ignorant when it passed an energy bill that included a ban on incandescent light bulbs beginning in 2014. (See also Milham/Morgan 2008 study of cancer incidence in California Schools and electromagnetic exposure, and 2008 Venice Resolution at ICEMS.eu).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Petty</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12766</guid>
		<description>SOSLightBulbs.com recently got this press release concerning mercury content in CFL&#039;s. We thought this could be of interest to your readers.

----------------------------------

Use even less mercury with MaxLite’s™ low mercury compact fluorescent lamps. Reinforcing its goal of producing the lowest mercury CFLs, MaxLite™ was one of the first in the industry to participate in the National Electrical Manufacturer’s Association’s (NEMA) initiative, “Voluntary Commitment on Mercury in CFLs.” Participants in the program pledge to limit the mercury content of their self-ballasted CFLs (residential use only) with less than 25 watts to 5 mg. and those with 25-40 watts to 6 mg. per bulb. MaxLite™ CFLs utilize only 1.2 to 2.5mg of mercury per lamp; half the amount present on the tip of a ball point pen, as compared to typical CFLS containing 4 mg. of mercury.

Always ahead of the curve, MaxLite™ has created a unique procedure to control the amount of liquid mercury in its compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). In its burner production, MaxLite™ accuracy is achieved by the utilization of a sealed tool akin to a medical injection tube. This permits defined quantities of liquid mercury to enter it each time the fluid is drawn. Then the identical amount of liquid mercury is infused into the burner. One amalgam dice is placed into the mercury control of the amalgam lamps. The amount of mercury is also fixed as the amalgam dice’s weight is controlled by amalgam manufacturers.

The low mercury quantity is the least amount MaxLite™ deems feasible for a compact fluorescent lamp to maintain a long and productive life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOSLightBulbs.com recently got this press release concerning mercury content in CFL&#8217;s. We thought this could be of interest to your readers.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Use even less mercury with MaxLite’s™ low mercury compact fluorescent lamps. Reinforcing its goal of producing the lowest mercury CFLs, MaxLite™ was one of the first in the industry to participate in the National Electrical Manufacturer’s Association’s (NEMA) initiative, “Voluntary Commitment on Mercury in CFLs.” Participants in the program pledge to limit the mercury content of their self-ballasted CFLs (residential use only) with less than 25 watts to 5 mg. and those with 25-40 watts to 6 mg. per bulb. MaxLite™ CFLs utilize only 1.2 to 2.5mg of mercury per lamp; half the amount present on the tip of a ball point pen, as compared to typical CFLS containing 4 mg. of mercury.</p>
<p>Always ahead of the curve, MaxLite™ has created a unique procedure to control the amount of liquid mercury in its compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). In its burner production, MaxLite™ accuracy is achieved by the utilization of a sealed tool akin to a medical injection tube. This permits defined quantities of liquid mercury to enter it each time the fluid is drawn. Then the identical amount of liquid mercury is infused into the burner. One amalgam dice is placed into the mercury control of the amalgam lamps. The amount of mercury is also fixed as the amalgam dice’s weight is controlled by amalgam manufacturers.</p>
<p>The low mercury quantity is the least amount MaxLite™ deems feasible for a compact fluorescent lamp to maintain a long and productive life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sinful Dollar &#187; Archive</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12743</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sinful Dollar &#187; Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>[...] so last year.  And they are still gushing over CFLs!  I am really, truly, sincerely sick of hearing each and every blog writer extol their doubt turned love for them. Stop with the &#8221;save [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so last year.  And they are still gushing over CFLs!  I am really, truly, sincerely sick of hearing each and every blog writer extol their doubt turned love for them. Stop with the &#8221;save [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12500</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-12500</guid>
		<description>Only someone with a trisomic 21st chromosome would buy LED light bulbs. The light emitted by these is the most ugly light imaginable.... a sickly gray blue. It&#039;s only rivaled by the old mercury vapor lights.

If a company can market an LED light bulb and make money doing so, it is proof that there is money to be made by marketing shit-filled donuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only someone with a trisomic 21st chromosome would buy LED light bulbs. The light emitted by these is the most ugly light imaginable&#8230;. a sickly gray blue. It&#8217;s only rivaled by the old mercury vapor lights.</p>
<p>If a company can market an LED light bulb and make money doing so, it is proof that there is money to be made by marketing shit-filled donuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Chan</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-10927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-10927</guid>
		<description>I actually bought some LED light bulbs for my home from this site. It&#039;s true that LED light bulbs can&#039;t replace CFL&#039;s just yet. They&#039;re more suited for directed lighting applications such as outdoor security spotlights or indoor accent lighting. They now come in warm white as well as daylight white and using a fraction of the energy of CFL&#039;s and incandescents and last up to 20 years. They&#039;re about equivalent to a 25W halogen. Yes - they&#039;re not super bright - but they do the job. At the same time, who needs blindingly bright 100W halogens anyway? I got them here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eternaleds.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LED Light Bulbs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually bought some LED light bulbs for my home from this site. It&#8217;s true that LED light bulbs can&#8217;t replace CFL&#8217;s just yet. They&#8217;re more suited for directed lighting applications such as outdoor security spotlights or indoor accent lighting. They now come in warm white as well as daylight white and using a fraction of the energy of CFL&#8217;s and incandescents and last up to 20 years. They&#8217;re about equivalent to a 25W halogen. Yes &#8211; they&#8217;re not super bright &#8211; but they do the job. At the same time, who needs blindingly bright 100W halogens anyway? I got them here:<br />
<a href="http://www.eternaleds.com" rel="nofollow">LED Light Bulbs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spotjack</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>Spotjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>I concur with Mr. Petty. I&#039;m an early adopter, I should say tester, of light bulbs. I bought the TCP 4 watt (15 watt incandescent equivalent) torpedo bulb and the TCP 4 watt A shape bulb. Both are 2700K color temp. I also bought the TCP T2 Spring Lamp 2 watt 5100K color temp. The 5100 is horrible. It&#039;s that greyish blueish cold and lonely looking color from sci fi flicks. The other two 2700K bulbs are not the same color as each other though so that is interesting. But the TCP bulbs are better than any other CFL bulbs I&#039;ve seen. I ordered the 3 watt TCP torpedo bulb and the cold cathode bulb to test from Mr. Petty&#039;s website, and I&#039;ll compare to the current TCP bulbs I have, because they will likely be a different color slightly. I want as close to the color of a 15 watt incandescent as possible. They&#039;re warmer and not depressing.

I&#039;ve also tried LED lights but they are not ready for prime time yet. They are way too dim and talk about depressing. The are sci fi lighting, as in battle ship or submarine lighting. The manufacturers need to combine the yellow LED (which I bought) with the white LED (which I also bought), on the same bulb with twice the number of LEDs per bulb, but still keeping the output low.

One thing I used to hate with flourescents which the frosted CFLs from TCP (2700K color temp) seem to have decreased, but still exists witht he LEDs) is a strobe effect. I&#039;m not talking about when the light first gets lit, I&#039;m talking about after it&#039;s warmed up and there is nothing wrong with the ballast. Regular flourescents have a super fast flicker that incandescents don&#039;t have. If you look at the flourescents out of the corner of your eye, or blink real fast, or wave your hand in front of them with your fingers spread, maybe you&#039;ll see what I mean, it&#039;s like they are blinking super fast. So fast that it&#039;s really hard to notice it. I could be insane but I think that&#039;s the case.

The new lamps don&#039;t seem to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Mr. Petty. I&#8217;m an early adopter, I should say tester, of light bulbs. I bought the TCP 4 watt (15 watt incandescent equivalent) torpedo bulb and the TCP 4 watt A shape bulb. Both are 2700K color temp. I also bought the TCP T2 Spring Lamp 2 watt 5100K color temp. The 5100 is horrible. It&#8217;s that greyish blueish cold and lonely looking color from sci fi flicks. The other two 2700K bulbs are not the same color as each other though so that is interesting. But the TCP bulbs are better than any other CFL bulbs I&#8217;ve seen. I ordered the 3 watt TCP torpedo bulb and the cold cathode bulb to test from Mr. Petty&#8217;s website, and I&#8217;ll compare to the current TCP bulbs I have, because they will likely be a different color slightly. I want as close to the color of a 15 watt incandescent as possible. They&#8217;re warmer and not depressing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also tried LED lights but they are not ready for prime time yet. They are way too dim and talk about depressing. The are sci fi lighting, as in battle ship or submarine lighting. The manufacturers need to combine the yellow LED (which I bought) with the white LED (which I also bought), on the same bulb with twice the number of LEDs per bulb, but still keeping the output low.</p>
<p>One thing I used to hate with flourescents which the frosted CFLs from TCP (2700K color temp) seem to have decreased, but still exists witht he LEDs) is a strobe effect. I&#8217;m not talking about when the light first gets lit, I&#8217;m talking about after it&#8217;s warmed up and there is nothing wrong with the ballast. Regular flourescents have a super fast flicker that incandescents don&#8217;t have. If you look at the flourescents out of the corner of your eye, or blink real fast, or wave your hand in front of them with your fingers spread, maybe you&#8217;ll see what I mean, it&#8217;s like they are blinking super fast. So fast that it&#8217;s really hard to notice it. I could be insane but I think that&#8217;s the case.</p>
<p>The new lamps don&#8217;t seem to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Petty</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Yellow is much easier on the eye&#039;s than daylight.  That is why 2,700k is better for home use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yellow is much easier on the eye&#8217;s than daylight.  That is why 2,700k is better for home use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>Well, I concur, that was my personal experience with 5000K.  But how is it possible when it&#039;s closer to daylight than 2700?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I concur, that was my personal experience with 5000K.  But how is it possible when it&#8217;s closer to daylight than 2700?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Petty</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>5000k is terrible on the eye&#039;s.  Always opt for 2700k or lower.  Some people like the light... but most people hate it because it is pretty harsh.

Try 2700K next time... I think you will be much happier with the result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5000k is terrible on the eye&#8217;s.  Always opt for 2700k or lower.  Some people like the light&#8230; but most people hate it because it is pretty harsh.</p>
<p>Try 2700K next time&#8230; I think you will be much happier with the result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamjusko.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/i-do-so-love-compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Jason, or anyone,

Isn&#039;t &quot;daylight&quot;, i.e. the 5000K supposed to be easier on the eyes?  I&#039;ve just tried it for a few hours, and now have a headache.  Should I have opted for the 2700K&#039;s?

Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, or anyone,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;daylight&#8221;, i.e. the 5000K supposed to be easier on the eyes?  I&#8217;ve just tried it for a few hours, and now have a headache.  Should I have opted for the 2700K&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
